Part of the service line leader’s role must be engaging physicians to generate buy-in for virtual care. Physicians are going to have their own concerns about integrating virtual care into everyday operations. To secure their support, you need to both make sure they feel comfortable and confident with providing telehealth and be clear in communicating the extra value telehealth can provide by complimenting, not replacing, in-person care.
Make telehealth easy for providers to use
Consider several interventions to provide “quick wins” for providers using telehealth and to facilitate long-term adoption.
1. Technology training
Ongoing telehealth training could be service line-specific or partnered across the organization and should include technology education and keep providers up-to-speed on any technological or policy changes.
2. Block scheduling
Block schedule virtual visits for certain hours of the day to lessen providers’ burden from transferring between virtual and in-person care. Add in flexibility to virtual visit timing to allow for unexpected delays or technology malfunctions.
3. Provide visit and technology support
Give providers the tools to maintain positive virtual patient interactions. Prior to the visit, providers should feel comfortable with their technology and set the stage for a virtual conversation. During the visit, providers should feel supported in addressing any technology issues that could distract from the patient and practice patient-centered communication. After the visit, providers should send a follow-up note recapping the visit and proactively ask for feedback.
Involve providers in telehealth workflow decisions
Service line leaders should enfranchise their providers to be involved in telehealth workflow decisions. Those decisions may include questions such as:
- What visits can be offered virtually?
- How will virtual services be built into the existing workflow?
- Is there an escalation path in place if the physician needs to refer the patient to in-person care?
Involving your providers in these decisions will lend clinical credibility to telehealth decisions and give providers a greater sense of agency over virtual care.
Case example: Midwestern AMC
A large academic medical center in the Midwest convened a cross-service line, monthly telehealth forum at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic while scaling up virtual services. The telehealth forum is attended by their virtual care team and a virtual care champion from every service line—typically the chair from each clinical department.
Although the forum was initially convened to provide telehealth trainings and support and to communicate any policy updates, it became a driving force for initiating service line analyses of common diagnoses that could or should be conducted entirely virtually.
To conduct this analysis, each virtual care champion pulled their service line’s top 100-200 most common diagnoses. They then worked with physicians on their team to decide which diagnoses and visit types lend themselves best to virtual care.
Once a service line identifies a visit type as optimal for virtual care, their team inputs a flag into their scheduling system that tags that visit type as optimal for virtual care. Since the start of the pandemic, this AMC has converted about 15-20% of ambulatory activity to telehealth.